[1]任瑶瑶.2014年编辑学研究论文述评[J].苏州教育学院学报,2015,(05):87-91.
 REN Yao-yao.A Review of the Editing Research Papers in 2014[J].,2015,(05):87-91.
点击复制

2014年编辑学研究论文述评()
分享到:

《苏州教育学院学报》[ISSN:1008-7931/CN:32-1556/G4]

卷:
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
87-91
栏目:
媒介与大众文化
出版日期:
2015-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Review of the Editing Research Papers in 2014
文章编号:
1008-7931(2015)05-0087-05
作者:
任瑶瑶
河南大学 新闻与传播学院
Author(s):
REN Yao-yao
School of Journalism and Communication, Henan University
关键词:
编辑学述评编辑实务编辑史
Keywords:
editing review editorial practice editorial history
分类号:
G236
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要: 以2014年发表的编辑学论文为研究对象,发现:编辑学理论研究少而精,具有实践意义及理论价值;新时期下的编辑研究数量多,侧重编辑角色转型,观照实际;编辑实务研究内容广泛,注重细节,具有指导意义;编辑学教育研究推崇产学研一体化,培养复合型人才;编辑史和编辑家研究少而零散,重个案分析轻系统构建。今后编辑学研究应重视理论创新,注重新媒体的运用,深化编辑学教育及编辑学史的研究。
Abstract:
Abstract:An analysis of the editing research papers published in 2014 indicates that the theoretical study of editing is scant in quantity but high in quality, and the study is of practical significance and theoretical value. In the new era, the researches into editing abound in quantity, attach importance to editors’ role change, and take practice into consideration. The editorial practice research covers a wide range of contents, pays attentions to details, and provides valuable guides. The research into editing education advocates the integration of industry, teaching and research, and upholds the training of compound talents. There are limited and scattered researches into editorial history and notable editors, which emphasizes case study and ignores system development. The editing research should focus more on theoretical innovation, the application of new media, and the study of editing education and editorial history.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡全章.百年李伯元小说研究述评[J].苏州教育学院学报,2009,(03):19.
[2]陆 彦.近代汉语程度副词研究述评[J].苏州教育学院学报,2014,(02):42.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2015-06-21 基金项目: 国家社会科学基金项目(15CXW012)作者简介: 任瑶瑶(1990—),女,山西汾阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向:新闻与传播学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-12-03